|
||||
|
||||
Reputation and Imperfectly Observable Commitment: The Chain Store Paradox Revisited
Brigitte Adolph Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Economics Elmar Wolfstetter Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Economics; CESifo (Center for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute for Economic Research); World Bank; Korea University - College of Economics and Commerce October 1996 Abstract: In their seminal solution of the chain store paradox Kreps and Wilson assumed that the incumbent monopolist is predisposed, with a small probability, to ght entry. Milgrom and Roberts suggested to view this predisposition to ght as a result of precommitment to an aggressive course of action. However, they did not examine whether such an ability to make commitments is actually chosen by a rational incumbent monopolist. The present paper fills this gap. We assume that the monopolist has access to an appropriate commitment mechanism, with a small probability. Due to the possibility of misunderstanding or communication error, commitments are not perfectly observable. Otherwise, the assumptions of Kreps and Wilson are maintained. These plausible modifications have drastic implications: Precommitment becomes useless, and reputation effects break down; Selten's chain store paradox comes back in full force.
JEL Classifications: D43, D82, D72 Working Paper SeriesDate posted: February 06, 1997 ; Last revised: March 13, 1998Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2009 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Policy
This page was served by apollo6 in 0.141 seconds.