Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2171339
 
 

Footnotes (236)



 


 



Binding Choices: Tax Elections & Federal/State Conformity


Heather M. Field


University of California Hastings College of the Law

November 5, 2012

Virginia Tax Review, Vol. 32, 2013
UC Hastings Research Paper No. 8

Abstract:     
The federal government wields tremendous power over state fiscal policy because most states’ income tax laws conform, at least to some degree, to the federal income tax laws. Extensive literature discusses the advantages and disadvantages of this tax base conformity, but scholars generally assume that the question facing state governments is to what extent the state tax provisions should conform to the federal tax provisions. Where the federal tax law provides explicit tax elections (e.g., a married couple’s choice to file jointly or separately), however, state legislators must decide not only whether the state law will conform to the federal law (i.e., affording taxpayers the same choice for state tax purposes), but legislators must also decide whether to bind each taxpayer, for state tax purposes, to the taxpayer’s federal tax choices. This additional decision matters because the simplicity, administrability, and revenue implications of election conformity can depend on whether and how state legislators constrain the taxpayer autonomy provided by the elections. Further, this additional decision presents a fundamental federalism question about how power over state fiscal policy should be allocated among the federal government, the state government, and the taxpayers themselves. Yet, despite the large number of tax elections in the federal income tax law, the existing literature regarding federal/state tax base conformity fails to provide guidance about how state legislators considering conformity to federal tax law should take into account the optionality inherent in explicit elections. This article fills that gap.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 64

Keywords: tax elections, state taxation, tax base, conformity, fiscal federalism

JEL Classification: H2, H71, H73, K34, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 5, 2012 ; Last revised: May 6, 2013

Suggested Citation

Field, Heather M., Binding Choices: Tax Elections & Federal/State Conformity (November 5, 2012). Virginia Tax Review, Vol. 32, 2013; UC Hastings Research Paper No. 8. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2171339

Contact Information

Heather M. Field (Contact Author)
University of California Hastings College of the Law ( email )
200 McAllister Street
San Francisco, CA 94102
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 627
Downloads: 109
Download Rank: 147,535
Footnotes:  236

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.234 seconds