Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2171844
 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



U.S. Convergence with International Competition Norms: Antitrust Law and Public Restraints on Competition


James C. Cooper


George Mason University School of Law - Law & Economics Center

William E. Kovacic


George Washington University - Law School

2010

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 1555-1610, August 2010
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-76
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-145
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-145

Abstract:     
In this Article we focus upon an area in which greater convergence of U.S. policy with the practice of many foreign countries is long overdue: the treatment of public policies that suppress competition. Whereas the European Union (“EU”) and numerous other jurisdictions have taken strong measures to limit restraints imposed by national government authorities and political subdivisions, U.S. antitrust policy in many ways is more tolerant of public restraints upon business rivalry. Since the early twentieth century, Supreme Court doctrines have evolved to grant states and the federal government broad rights to enact laws that restrain competition. Further, individual groups are largely free to lobby for laws designed to erect marketplace barriers, and in many cases to mire their competitors in a morass of governmental processes. Because government action (and private conduct to obtain such action) is challengeable in only relative narrow circumstances, much of the battle takes place in the legislative and regulatory arenas rather than in courts. Accordingly, advocacy is the primary tool available to both public and private enforcers of the U.S. antitrust laws to challenge state-imposed restraints on competition. Although the U.S. competition advocacy program has achieved important success, it is not enough. United States enforcers should stand on equal footing with their EU and other foreign counterparts in being able to challenge state action that threatens competition in the same manner as they can challenge private conduct. In this paper, we describe measures available to competition authorities in the U.S. and other jurisdictions to resist encroachments by government policies on the competitive process. We suggest approaches by which the framework of controls upon anticompetitive government policies could be strengthened in the United States.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: Adam Smith, BRIC, Brazil, cartel, China, code, collaboration, containment, DOJ, Department Justice, ETR, economic, FDA, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Hatch-Waxman Act, immunity, India, Joe, Joseph Brodley, nations, Noerr-Pennington, register, regulations, Russia, theory, Timothy Muris, wealth

JEL Classification: D41, F12, K21, K23, L41, L42, L43, L44, L51

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 7, 2012 ; Last revised: December 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Cooper, James C. and Kovacic, William E., U.S. Convergence with International Competition Norms: Antitrust Law and Public Restraints on Competition (2010). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 4, pp. 1555-1610, August 2010; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 12-76; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-145; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 2012-145. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2171844

Contact Information

James C. Cooper (Contact Author)
George Mason University School of Law - Law & Economics Center ( email )
3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-9582 (Phone)

George Mason Law School Logo

William E. Kovacic
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202.994.8123 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.aspx?id=1731

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 393
Downloads: 75
Download Rank: 188,250
Citations:  2
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Competition Agency Design: What's on the Menu?
By William E. Kovacic and David Hyman

Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds