Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending?
National University of Singapore
Harvard University - Department of Economics; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business
October 1, 2012
Kreisman Working Papers Series in Housing Law and Policy No. 8
Yes, it did. We use exogenous variation in banks’ incentives to conform to the standards of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) around regulatory exam dates to trace out the effect of the CRA on lending activity. Our empirical strategy compares lending behavior of banks undergoing CRA exams within a given census tract in a given month to the behavior of banks operating in the same census tract-month that do not face these exams. We find that adherence to the act led to riskier lending by banks: in the six quarters surrounding the CRA exams lending is elevated on average by about 5 percent every quarter and loans in these quarters default by about 15 percent more often. These patterns are accentuated in CRA-eligible census tracts and are concentrated among large banks. The effects are strongest during the time period when the market for private securitization was booming.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Keywords: CRA, Financial Institutions, Mortgages, Financial Crisis, Household Finance
JEL Classification: G21, G28working papers series
Date posted: November 8, 2012 ; Last revised: January 8, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.485 seconds