Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2172560
 
 

Footnotes (41)



 


 



Defining Nature as a Common Pool Resource


Jonathan D. Rosenbloom


Drake University Law School

November 7, 2012

Environmental Law and Contrasting Ideas of Nature: A Constructivist Approach (ed. Keith H. Hirokawa) (2013, Forthcoming)
Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-35

Abstract:     
One of the many ways in which we attempt to study resource use and conservation is to define natural resources as “common pool resources.” Yet in a broad sense we can understand nature more generally as a common pool resource with which we maintain a special relationship. This definition incorporates several legal, behavioral, and ecological concepts that seek to capture the intricate and complex place where nature and the governance of nature collide. Once we apply the common pool resource definition to nature, we commit to viewing nature through five distinct and specific lenses that are embedded in the common pool resource framework. This chapter explores these commitments in an effort to establish a foundation for related research on how these common pool resource-specific lenses may influence the management of nature. The chapter begins with a short background on common pool resources and the understanding of them in the legal literature. The chapter then turns to five conceptual commitments we make by labeling nature as a common pool resource. An exploration of the commitments reveals that they have both intended and unintended consequences on the way we view nature. Those consequences, in turn, have both positive and negative implications for the management of nature. Further, regardless of whether the commitments help facilitate positive or negative approaches to nature management, each commitment places limiting and potentially harmful constraints on the broader perspective with which we should view nature. The chapter concludes by raising the question of whether this limited perspective fully considers pertinent characteristics inherent in nature and whether we should think more broadly when defining nature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: nature, natural capital, environmental, commons, common pool resource, property, property rights

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 8, 2012 ; Last revised: February 4, 2014

Suggested Citation

Rosenbloom, Jonathan D., Defining Nature as a Common Pool Resource (November 7, 2012). Environmental Law and Contrasting Ideas of Nature: A Constructivist Approach (ed. Keith H. Hirokawa) (2013, Forthcoming); Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-35. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2172560

Contact Information

Jonathan D. Rosenbloom (Contact Author)
Drake University Law School ( email )
27th & Carpenter Sts.
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 599
Downloads: 140
Download Rank: 121,177
Footnotes:  41

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.218 seconds