Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts

International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 204-234, 2001

37 Pages Posted: 10 Nov 2012 Last revised: 14 Nov 2012

See all articles by Emily M. Weitzenboeck

Emily M. Weitzenboeck

Norwegian Research Center for Computers & Law, University of Oslo, Norway

Date Written: 2001

Abstract

In this paper, an analysis is made of the increasingly active role of electronic agents, especially intelligent agents, in the negotiation and formation of contracts. Among the different doctrinal solutions that might be applicable is to consider conferring some degree of legal personality on agents or, at the other extreme, to treat them as mere communication tools. Another alternative discussed is whether intelligent agents should be considered as agents under the law of agency. Following an analysis of the two main theories of consent – the subjective and the objective theories – it is argued that the objective theory is applicable to the use of electronic agents in contracting. There is then a short examination of some enacted legislation that deal with contract formation through the involvement of electronic agents. Finally, some practical considerations for the widespread use of electronic agents in electronic commerce are highlighted, and some solutions proposed.

Keywords: electronic agent, intelligent agent, contract formation, formation of contract, contract automation

Suggested Citation

Weitzenboeck, Emily M., Electronic Agents and the Formation of Contracts (2001). International Journal of Law and Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 204-234, 2001, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2173226

Emily M. Weitzenboeck (Contact Author)

Norwegian Research Center for Computers & Law, University of Oslo, Norway ( email )

PO Box 6706 St Olavs plass
Oslo, 0130
Norway

HOME PAGE: http://folk.uio.no/emilyw/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
789
Abstract Views
2,468
Rank
58,285
PlumX Metrics