Free Movement, Federalism and Institutional Choice: A Canada-EU Comparison
University of Cambridge - Faculty of Law
December 1, 2011
Cambridge Law Journal, 2012
University of Cambridge Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 28/2012
Although very different in many respects, the EU and Canada nevertheless confront common problems in certain areas. One such common problem is how to manage inter-state regulatory diversity within a federal (or federal-like), multinational system. This paper compares the different ways in which the EU and Canada have chosen to address the problem of national barriers to trade within their internal markets, and the consequences of these choices. It is somewhat counter-intuitive for EU lawyers that a full-fledged state may have an internal market that is less integrated than that of the EU; and yet that is the case in Canada. The comparison is illuminating as to the different possible approaches of federal polities to the problem of state regulatory choices and barriers to trade, the paramount importance of institutional choice, and the significance of historical and political circumstances.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 40
Keywords: European Union, European integration, EU law, constitutional law of the EU, Canada, federalism, dual federalism, classic federalism, cooperative federalism, separation of competences, single market, free movement, institutional choice, Court of Justice of the EU, Supreme Court of Canada
JEL Classification: K1, K2, K3, K4
Date posted: November 14, 2012 ; Last revised: December 6, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.156 seconds