Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175232
 
 

Footnotes (250)



 


 



Condemnation Without Basis: An Expressive Failure of Corporate Prosecutions


Gregory M. Gilchrist


University of Toledo College of Law

November 13, 2012

64 Hastings Law Journal 1121 (2013)
University of Toledo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-23

Abstract:     
This is the second of two Articles on the expressive aspects of corporate criminal liability. The first Article argued that to justify imposing criminal liability on corporations we must refer to the expressive function of criminal liability. This Article considers the expressive function of actual corporate prosecutions and identifies aspects of corporate prosecutions that generate expressive costs rather than benefits. These are the expressive failures of corporate prosecutions. This Article identifies a number of these failures and introduces a model of perceived legitimacy and the expressive function of punishment that explains how expressive failures harm the legal system. Mere respondeat superior liability — holding corporations criminally liable where there is no basis to condemn the corporation qua corporation — is the most significant expressive failure. It is also the easiest to fix: Allow corporations a good-faith defense against criminal liability. Good faith defenses have been proposed before, but this is the first proposal based on the expressive impact of the defense. A good faith defense will limit the application of corporate criminal liability to those instances where there is a basis to condemn the corporation as a whole, thus realigning the expression inherent in criminal punishment with commonly held views about blaming corporations.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Keywords: Corporate Criminal Liability, White Collar, Legitimacy, Expressivism, Internal View, Good Faith Defense

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 14, 2012 ; Last revised: August 20, 2013

Suggested Citation

Gilchrist, Gregory M., Condemnation Without Basis: An Expressive Failure of Corporate Prosecutions (November 13, 2012). 64 Hastings Law Journal 1121 (2013); University of Toledo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-23. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175232

Contact Information

Gregory M. Gilchrist (Contact Author)
University of Toledo College of Law ( email )
2801 W Bancroft
MS 507
Toledo, OH 43606
United States
419-530-2712 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 477
Downloads: 104
Download Rank: 152,657
Footnotes:  250

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds