The Austrian School and Market Equilibrium Theories

Wassim S. Daher

Swiss Management Centre University (Switzerland)

November 18, 2012

Two theories prevail when studying and analyzing the economies of markets: the theory of market process (Austrian way) and the theory of market equilibrium. The market process theory adopts human action and subjective interaction as a main variable. The market process theory makes a number of assumptions as the framework of its application: humans choose, the market exists, knowledge is imperfect, and money or production exists. It also explains the role of entrepreneurs in market dynamics. Neo-classical economists follow a different methodology where individual behavior is approached from a rational perspective that assumes maximization of choice. Market players are expected to maximize utility knowing their means and ends. The number of outcomes are restricted and taken into account through probability calculations. The scenarios of outcomes are weighted assuming perfect information. The Austrians disagree with Neo-classical economists on various grounds: mathematical equilibrium approach, interpretation of individual behavior as maximization, assumption of perfect knowledge, and perspective to profit. The different assumptions in the different models of market equilibrium can be considered as adopted boundary limits of controlled scenarios of the more general model of market process.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Austrian, market, equilibrium, entrepreneur, neo-classical

Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Daher, Wassim S., The Austrian School and Market Equilibrium Theories (November 18, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175260 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2175260

Contact Information

Wassim S. Daher (Contact Author)
Swiss Management Centre University (Switzerland) ( email )
Balz Zimmermannstrasse 7
Transknowlogy Campus
Zuerich, CH-8302
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 479
Downloads: 96
Download Rank: 175,068
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.328 seconds