Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175378
 
 

Footnotes (51)



 


 



The Reform of Counterterrorism Stop and Search after Gillan v. United Kingdom


John Ip


University of Auckland - Faculty of Law

November 14, 2012

(2013) 14 Human Rights Law Review 729

Abstract:     
This paper considers the reform of the power to stop and search originally conferred by sections 44 to 47 of the Terrorism Act 2000. These sections permitted executive branch actors to authorise stops and searches of vehicles and pedestrians within a broad geographical area for up to 28 days. Police officers could then employ this power to search for any articles which could be used in connection with terrorism, irrespective of whether they had grounds for suspecting the presence of articles of that kind. These sections essentially created two broad discretions: a “front-end discretion” of a senior police officer and the Secretary of State as to whether to make an authorisation and confirm an authorisation, and a “back-end discretion” of an individual officer as to whom to target for a stop and search.

In Gillan & Quinton v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 28, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the stop and search power under sections 44 to 47 of the Terrorism Act violated Article 8 of the ECHR. This precipitated a series of changes to counterterrorism stop and search in the United Kingdom. This paper details those changes, and considers whether they are sufficient to ensure compliance with the Gillan decision. Next, the paper discusses the role that various political and legal institutions have played in scrutinising the operation of this particular counterterrorism power and how they have contributed to its eventual reform. The argument here is that the reform of counterterrorism stop and search suggests that courts, legislative bodies, and other mechanisms of oversight and review all have important and complementary roles to play in ensuring appropriate governance of executive counterterrorism activities.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 26

Keywords: Stop and search, Counterterrorism and constitutionalism, European Court of Human Rights, Terrorism, National Security

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 13, 2012 ; Last revised: December 5, 2013

Suggested Citation

Ip, John, The Reform of Counterterrorism Stop and Search after Gillan v. United Kingdom (November 14, 2012). (2013) 14 Human Rights Law Review 729. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175378 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2175378

Contact Information

John Ip (Contact Author)
University of Auckland - Faculty of Law ( email )
Private Bag 92019
Auckland Mail Centre
Auckland, 1142
New Zealand
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 591
Downloads: 183
Download Rank: 94,594
Footnotes:  51

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.250 seconds