Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175978
 


 



Congress (In-) Action: Resolving a Court Created Gordian Knot on Software Patents


Christal A. Sheppard


University of Nebraska - College of Law

November 14, 2012


Abstract:     
The possession of power does not assure its exercise. The Constitution makes clear that should Congress choose to grant patents Congress does not have to, but should they so choose, Congress is limited to implementations that 1) “promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts” 2) are “for limited times” 3) to “Authors and Inventors” solely for their “writings and discoveries” and 4) the right is “exclusive.” Yet, while the Congress has chosen to exercise the power to create a monopoly right and modified the law as recently as 2011 to balance the equities, the most basic notion of what should be eligible for consideration for patent has not been directly addressed by the Congress since the 1952 Patent Act. While Congress is the entity constitutionally charged with deciding what implementations promote the Progress of Science and the Useful Arts, this determination has been abdicated to the Courts and has been particularly problematic in the area of software patents. The following are four suggestions for immediate Congressional action to cut the Court created Gordian Knot.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 3

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 15, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Sheppard, Christal A., Congress (In-) Action: Resolving a Court Created Gordian Knot on Software Patents (November 14, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2175978 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2175978

Contact Information

Christal A. Sheppard (Contact Author)
University of Nebraska - College of Law ( email )
103 McCollum Hall
P.O. Box 830902
Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
United States
4024721250 (Phone)
4024725185 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://law.unl.edu/facstaff/faculty/resident/csheppard.shtml
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 359
Downloads: 45
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.312 seconds