Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177158
 


 



Marginalized Mothers, Reproductive Autonomy, and ‘Repeat Losses to Care’


Pamela Cox


affiliation not provided to SSRN

December 2012

Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 541-561, 2012

Abstract:     
Over 70,000 children are ‘looked after’ by local authorities in England and Wales. Emerging research suggests that a significant proportion of their birth parents have either already lost a child to permanent adoption or will go on to lose others. These ‘repeat loss’ cases raise difficult questions about marginalized mothers and their reproductive autonomy. This article considers past and present tactics used by the state in its attempts to limit that autonomy, including institutionalization, sterilization, long‐acting contraception, and permanent adoption. It argues that the gradual democratization of intimate citizenship over the past century, defined as a person's ability to choose and direct their intimate relationships, has obliged the contemporary state to develop new tactics which aim to build personal capacity and to balance enhanced child protection with enhanced reproductive autonomy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: November 17, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Cox, Pamela, Marginalized Mothers, Reproductive Autonomy, and ‘Repeat Losses to Care’ (December 2012). Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 541-561, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177158 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00599.x

Contact Information

Pamela Cox (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 142
Downloads: 0

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.313 seconds