Characteristics, Covariances, and Average Returns: 1929-1997
James L. Davis
Dimensional Fund Advisors Inc.
Eugene F. Fama
University of Chicago - Booth School of Business (Finance Authors)
Kenneth R. French
Dartmouth College - Tuck School of Business; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
Journal of Finance, Vol. 55, No. 1, February 2000
The value premium in U.S. stocks returns is robust. The positive relation between average return and book-to-market equity (BE/ME) is as strong for 1929-63 as for the subsequent period studied in previous papers. Like others, we also find a size premium in stock returns. Small stocks have higher average returns than big stocks. The size premium is, however, weaker and less reliable than the value premium. The relations between average return and firm characteristics (size and BE/ME) are better explained by a three-factor risk model than by the behavioral hypothesis that investor overreaction causes characteristics to be compensated irrespective of risk loadings.
JEL Classification: G12Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 13, 2001
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.875 seconds