Obligations as Property
University of Western Australia - Faculty of Law
November 18, 2012
University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2011
UWA Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2012-15
A widely asserted proposition is that all property rights are rights in rem and that rights in personam, such as debts and bank accounts, are not property rights. The proposition was advocated by John Austin based on his interpretation of Roman law. The obvious difficulty with the proposition is that it is irreconcilable with the case law because a number of cases from ultimate appellant courts confirm that debts are property rights. The author examines relevant case law and interpretations of Roman law to argue that the proposition that all property rights are rights in rem is based on a misunderstanding of Roman law. The author concludes that the assertion should be rejected as erroneous. Debts in the form of money obligations owed by one person to another are indeed property rights.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: property rights, Roman Law, in rem, debts
Date posted: November 19, 2012 ; Last revised: November 26, 2012
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.203 seconds