Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177470
 


 



The Meaning and Protection of ‘Cultural Objects and Places of Worship’ under the 1977 Additional Protocols


Marina Lostal Becerril


University of Helsinki - Eric Castren Institute of International Law and Human Rights (ECI)

2012

59 Netherlands International Law Review 3 (2012), pp. 455-72

Abstract:     
This article addresses R. O’Keefe’s 1999 publication entitled ‘The Meaning of “Cultural Property” under the 1954 Hague Convention’. There the author made two points regarding the protection of ‘cultural objects and places of worship’ in the 1977 Additional Protocols to the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 that have been commonly shared by legal scholarship and practice. First, he claimed that despite the divergences between the definitions of cultural property in the 1954 Hague Convention and the 1977 Additional Protocols, the spectrum of cultural property they covered was exactly the same. Secondly, he held that the Additional Protocols awarded a higher regime of protection to cultural property for not being subject to imperative military necessity. This article reconsiders and qualifies these statements. It argues that (i) while both instruments tackle objects which represent each party’s national heritage, their scope of application differ since the 1954 Hague Convention cannot cover places of worship that constitute the spiritual heritage of peoples per se. This, we will see, has resulted in its own different consequences in international practice. (ii) It is erroneous to maintain tout court that the 1954 Hague Convention offers a weaker regime of protection for cultural property. From a closer look at the relationship between the concepts of ‘military objectives’ and ‘imperative military necessity’, a distinct and more nuanced conclusion follows: the 1954 Hague Convention offers stricter guarantees against the likelihood of acts of hostility aimed at cultural property. This article continues a scholarly debate initiated by O’Keefe, casts some clarity on issues that seem to trouble the ICTY, and challenges the mainstream interpretation given to the protection of cultural property under the two Additional Protocols.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 19, 2012 ; Last revised: January 11, 2014

Suggested Citation

Lostal Becerril, Marina, The Meaning and Protection of ‘Cultural Objects and Places of Worship’ under the 1977 Additional Protocols (2012). 59 Netherlands International Law Review 3 (2012), pp. 455-72. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2177470

Contact Information

Marina Lostal Becerril (Contact Author)
University of Helsinki - Eric Castren Institute of International Law and Human Rights (ECI) ( email )
Helsinki
Finland
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 380
Downloads: 8

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.469 seconds