Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178223
 
 

Footnotes (98)



 


 



Rebutting the Myths About Race and the Death Penalty


Kent Scheidegger


Criminal Justice Legal Foundation

November 19, 2012

Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 147, 2012

Abstract:     
In 1984, a study on race and the death penalty went to trial in Georgia, with expert testimony on both sides. The federal district judge found that the study did not show what its principal author, David Baldus, claimed. To the extent it showed anything, it showed just the opposite, that neither race of the perpetrator nor race of the victim played a significant role in capital sentencing decisions. Yet the Baldus study is routinely cited as proof of what the author claimed rather than what the court found. The public perception of race and the death penalty has been severely distorted by misleading claims and faulty reporting. The body of evidence, when critically examined, shows that the reality of race and capital sentencing in the United States today is quite different from what is commonly believed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Keywords: race, capital punishment

JEL Classification: K14

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 28, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Scheidegger, Kent, Rebutting the Myths About Race and the Death Penalty (November 19, 2012). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 147, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2178223

Contact Information

Kent Scheidegger (Contact Author)
Criminal Justice Legal Foundation ( email )
2131 L Street
Sacramento, CA 95816
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www. cjlf.org
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 490
Downloads: 107
Download Rank: 150,447
Footnotes:  98

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds