Footnotes (225)



Discharging Fiduciary Debts

Zvi S. Rosen

Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law

April 3, 2013

87 Am. Bankr. L. J. 51 (Winter 2013)

Under section 523(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, a debt is not dischargeable if it results from “fraud or defalcation” while the debtor is acting in a “fiduciary capacity.” Although this provision has existed in various incarnations in the bankruptcy law since 1841, the meaning of both the terms “defalcation” and “fiduciary capacity” is subject to confusion and disagreement among the courts. This piece explores the meaning of these terms from the nineteenth century for today, and demonstrates that the best meaning of “defalcation” while acting in a “fiduciary capacity” is the failure of one who holds the funds of another in a trust-like situation to account for those funds. A split of authority among the circuit courts has existed for years regarding these issues, but the Supreme Court has recently granted certiorari to decide these issues in the case of Bullock v. Bankchampaign.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Keywords: bankruptcy, defalcation, fiduciary, discharge, Bullock v. Bankchampaign, Chapman v. Forsyth

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: November 25, 2012 ; Last revised: September 2, 2013

Suggested Citation

Rosen, Zvi S., Discharging Fiduciary Debts (April 3, 2013). 87 Am. Bankr. L. J. 51 (Winter 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2180143 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2180143

Contact Information

Zvi S. Rosen (Contact Author)
Hofstra University - Maurice A. Deane School of Law ( email )
121 Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 390
Downloads: 67
Download Rank: 238,072
Footnotes:  225

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.219 seconds