Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2181453
 
 

Citations (2)



 
 

Footnotes (74)



 


 



In Defense of the Death Penalty


Paul G. Cassell


University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

2008

IACJ Journal, Summer 2008

Abstract:     
The aims of this text are two-fold. The first is to provide a brief overview of the underpinnings of the death penalty. (The death penalty is firmly grounded in many traditional rationales for punishment, a fact that may explaining why death penalty abolitionists have made so little progress in challenging it head on.) The second is to examine the new wave of administrative challenges to the death penalty. Here again, these claims fail to provide a significant reason for abolishing capital punishment.

Perhaps the most straightforward argument for the death penalty is that it saves innocent lives by preventing convicted murderers from killing again...

Some sense of the risk here is conveyed by the fact that, of the roughly 52,000 state prison inmates serving time for murder, an estimated 810 had previously been convicted of murder and had killed 821 persons following those convictions. Executing each of these inmates after the first murder conviction would have saved the lives of more than 800 persons.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: November 27, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Cassell, Paul G., In Defense of the Death Penalty (2008). IACJ Journal, Summer 2008. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2181453

Contact Information

Paul G. Cassell (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
332 S. 1400 East Front
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States
801-585-5202 (Phone)
801-581-6897 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,311
Downloads: 368
Download Rank: 44,172
Citations:  2
Footnotes:  74

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds