In Defense of the Death Penalty
Paul G. Cassell
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law
IACJ Journal, Summer 2008
The aims of this text are two-fold. The first is to provide a brief overview of the underpinnings of the death penalty. (The death penalty is firmly grounded in many traditional rationales for punishment, a fact that may explaining why death penalty abolitionists have made so little progress in challenging it head on.) The second is to examine the new wave of administrative challenges to the death penalty. Here again, these claims fail to provide a significant reason for abolishing capital punishment.
Perhaps the most straightforward argument for the death penalty is that it saves innocent lives by preventing convicted murderers from killing again...
Some sense of the risk here is conveyed by the fact that, of the roughly 52,000 state prison inmates serving time for murder, an estimated 810 had previously been convicted of murder and had killed 821 persons following those convictions. Executing each of these inmates after the first murder conviction would have saved the lives of more than 800 persons.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: November 27, 2012
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.579 seconds