Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2181565
 


 



Decoupling Taxes and Marriage: Beyond Innocence and Income Splitting


Michelle Drumbl


Washington and Lee University School of Law

November 27, 2012

Columbia Journal of Tax Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012
Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-37

Abstract:     
Fourteen years ago, members of Congress sympathetically listened as divorcees testified to their struggles to raise children while being pursued by the Internal Revenue Service for tax debts, often unknown to them, that were attributable to their ex-husbands' income. Rather than adopting one of many proposals to end joint and several liability, Congress instead elected to expand the grounds on which these individuals could seek relief from such liability. Since that time, taxpayers have seen a steady expansion of the grounds for so-called “innocent spouse relief” that has evolved through a combination of legislative, administrative, and judicial action. Yet the process for relief remains time-consuming, inefficient, and unpredictable. The majority of initial requests for innocent spouse relief are denied. The taxpayer can appeal administratively and also seek judicial review if relief is denied, but sometimes will spend several years and untold resources in pursuit of a claim that may ultimately be unsuccessful. The process is also a questionable use of Internal Revenue Service personnel, in that it frequently calls upon these employees to address the most intimate aspects of a failed relationship, including spousal abuse, addictions, and mental health problems. These employees often must make a determination based upon a “he-said, she-said” presentation of the facts — an odd task for an agency charged with enforcing the revenue laws.

This article visits the historic rationales for joint and several liability, both in light of the flawed relief process and also in the context of modern-day American society, in which married couples constitute only half of all households and cohabitation is increasingly more common. I conclude that Congress should eliminate the “married” filing statuses and require each married individual to file a separate return. If it did so, joint liability and the innocent spouse relief process would both cease to exist. The historical policy justifications for imposing joint and several liability are no longer rational in light of changed demographics and technological advances. Rather than an “unusual privilege,” which it was long said to be, filing jointly has become a risky conundrum, particularly for low-income taxpayers. As the nation debates tax reform, it is appropriate to rethink the policy of retaining the “married” filing statuses in light of the ways in which family structures, society, and the Internal Revenue Code have changed since joint and several liability was introduced in 1938.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 63

Keywords: joint liability, innocent spouse, marriage, taxes

JEL Classification: K10, K34

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: November 28, 2012 ; Last revised: October 9, 2013

Suggested Citation

Drumbl, Michelle, Decoupling Taxes and Marriage: Beyond Innocence and Income Splitting (November 27, 2012). Columbia Journal of Tax Law, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2012 ; Washington & Lee Legal Studies Paper No. 2012-37. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2181565

Contact Information

Michelle Drumbl (Contact Author)
Washington and Lee University School of Law ( email )
Lexington, VA 24450
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 518
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 196,051

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.329 seconds