Should Social Security and Medicare Be More Market-Based?
New York University School of Law
December 1, 2012
NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-41
Contemporary political debate about Social Security and Medicare often conflates the issue of the programs’ long-term fiscal sustainability with that of whether their design should be made more market-based, such as by transforming Social Security into a private accounts program and Medicare into a voucher-based program. In fact, the sustainability and design issues are fundamentally separate.
This article assesses the case for making the programs more market-based by using two main conceptual vehicles: (1) the model for understanding the programs’ substantive features and rationales that I offered in my books, Making Sense of Social Security Reform and Who Should Pay for Medicare?, and (2) Paul Samuelson’s classic description of Social Security as providing what we would now call an implicit financial instrument that reflects an intergenerational compact. In the end, it reaches largely skeptical conclusions about altering the programs to use either private accounts or vouchers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 78
Keywords: Social Security, Medicare, private accounts, Ryan Medicare plan
JEL Classification: H1, H2, H4, H5, I1working papers series
Date posted: November 28, 2012 ; Last revised: January 17, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.422 seconds