A Comparison of Three Different Pension Savings Products with Special Emphasis on the Payout Phase

Peter Løchte Jørgensen

University of Aarhus - Business and Social Sciences

Per Linnemann



Annals of Actuarial Science, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 137-152, March 2012

The purpose of this article is to illustrate how the pension benefits a pension saver will (expect to) receive will depend on the type of pension scheme chosen. We compare three widely different pension savings products: the ‘‘traditional’’ with-profits scheme involving bonus entitlement (average interest rate product), a market-based Unit Link scheme and, finally, a formula based smoothed investment-linked annuity scheme – TimePension in short – which is on many points a cross between the two prior-mentioned types of savings products. The three product types mentioned above have been analysed in previous literature, but those comparisons were based almost entirely on the values of pension savings accounts at the expiry of the accumulation period. This article will include the payout phase (decumulation phase) in the analysis, enabling us to analyse the size of paid-out pension benefits themselves as well as the possibilities of adjusting these benefits periodically. Compared to earlier articles, we have also improved the underlying model for the uncertainty of the underlying financial market. The article demonstrates that expected pension benefits from the three schemes are an increasing function of the allocation to shares in the underlying investment portfolios. TimePension involves the highest allocation to shares and therefore offers, on average, the highest pension benefits, followed by the Unit Link scheme. In the third and last place comes the traditional with-profits scheme, which has a relatively low allocation to shares, but which, in return, also provides relatively safe and stable pension benefits. We also show, however, that the stability of pension benefits from a TimePension scheme is completely level with the stability of benefits from the traditional scheme. Unit Link-based pension benefits, on the other hand, vary far more, and pension savers in this product segment will experience much higher annual adjustments – in a both negative and positive direction – than savers in the other product segments.

Keywords: Comparison of retirement products, Stochastic financial analysis, Traditional with-profits, Unitlinked, Formula based smoothed investment-linked, Payout phase, Stabilisation of retirement income payments

Not Available For Download

Date posted: November 30, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Jørgensen, Peter Løchte and Linnemann, Per, A Comparison of Three Different Pension Savings Products with Special Emphasis on the Payout Phase (2012). Annals of Actuarial Science, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 137-152, March 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2183058

Contact Information

Peter Løchte Jørgensen (Contact Author)
University of Aarhus - Business and Social Sciences ( email )
Finance Research Group
Fuglesangs Allé 4
DK-8210 Aarhus, 8210
+4587165117 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://pure.au.dk/portal/en/plj@econ.au.dk
Per Linnemann
Independent ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 166

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.172 seconds