Of Trayvon Martin, George Zimmerman, and Legal Expressivism: Why Massachusetts Should Stand Its Ground on 'Stand Your Ground'
Louis N. Schulze Jr.
New England Law | Boston
November 28, 2012
New England Law Review on Remand, Vol. 47, p. 34, 2012
New England Law | Boston Research Paper No. 13-01
This essay suggests that the expressive impact of Stand Your Ground laws alters the shared norms governing our collective understanding of the moral limits of “self-defense.” The essay argues that the theory of Legal Expressivism can explain the widespread misunderstanding of the limits of self-defense, as demonstrated by the institutional and popular reactions to the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman. To support this thesis, the piece briefly explains Stand Your Ground statutes and legal expressivism. It then details the nature of the expressive function of these statutes and asserts that Massachusetts, which recently considered the adoption of such a provision, should reject this change principally to rebuff the symbolic message these laws convey.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 9
Keywords: Legal expressivism, criminal law, self defense, Trayvon Martin, George ZimmermanAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 1, 2012 ; Last revised: February 13, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.453 seconds