References (2)


Footnotes (14)



The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering

Stephen Gardiner

University of Washington, Seattle

November 1, 2012

PS: Political Science and Politics, 2012

Some argue that geoengineering by desperate nations would be justified, and that the developed nations ought to aid them through research on how to do it. In this paper, I explore two interpretations of such arguments and find them wanting. I also argue that, whether or not geoengineering by the desperate would be justified, focusing on justification alone obscures important aspects of the ethics of geoengineering.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 11

Keywords: solar radiation management, ethics and geoengineering, self-defense, consent, domination

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 2, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Gardiner, Stephen, The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering (November 1, 2012). PS: Political Science and Politics, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2183457

Contact Information

Stephen Gardiner (Contact Author)
University of Washington, Seattle ( email )
NE Colombia Rd.
Seattle, WA 98195
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.phil.washington.edu/people_gardiner.htm
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,373
Downloads: 187
Download Rank: 109,502
References:  2
Footnotes:  14

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.344 seconds