Unregulated Internal Investigations: Achieving Fairness for Corporate Constituents
Bruce A. Green
Fordham University School of Law
Ellen S. Podgor
Stetson University College of Law
December 3, 2012
Boston College Law Review, Vol. 54, 2013
Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2184348
Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2012-22
This Article focuses on the relationship between corporations and their employee constituents in the context of corporate internal investigations, an unregulated multi-million dollar business. The classic approach provided in the 1981 Supreme Court opinion, Upjohn v. United States, is contrasted with the reality of modern-day internal investigations that may exploit individuals to achieve a corporate benefit with the government. Attorney-client privilege becomes an issue as corporate constituents perceive that corporate counsel is representing their interests, when in fact these internal investigators are obtaining information for the corporation to barter with the government. Legal precedent and ethics rules provide little relief to these corporate employees. This Article suggests that courts need to move beyond the Upjohn decision and recognize this new landscape. It advocates for corporate fair dealing and provides a multi-faceted approach to achieve this aim. Ultimately this Article considers how best to level the playing field between corporations and their employees in matters related to the corporate internal investigation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: corporate internal investigations, attorney-client privilege, Upjohn, corporate fair dealing, corporate criminal liability, white collar crime, ethics
JEL Classification: K14, K22, K20, K42Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 6, 2012 ; Last revised: February 5, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.719 seconds