Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184589
 
 

Footnotes (124)



 


 



Self-Replicating Technologies


Jeremy N. Sheff


St. John's University School of Law

December 3, 2012

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 229, 2013
St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-0026

Abstract:     
Self-replicating technologies pose a challenge to the legal regimes we ordinarily rely on to promote a balance between innovation and competition. This article examines recent efforts by the federal courts to deal with the leading edge of this policy challenge in cases involving the quintessential self-replicating technology: the seed. In a recent series of cases involving the invocation of the patent exhaustion defense by purchasers of Monsanto’s 'Roundup-Ready' genetically engineered herbicide-resistant crop technologies, farmers have argued that Monsanto's patent rights do not extend to the second generation of soybeans grown from a patented first-generation seed. In each case, the Federal Circuit found for Monsanto and against the farmers. The Supreme Court is about to take up the issue for the first time.

In this article, I argue that the Federal Circuit reached the right result in the Roundup-Ready cases, but that it failed to articulate a satisfactory justification for its decisions. That justification, I claim, is that the patent-based policy set by the Federal Circuit is preferable to alternative legal regimes — such as trade secret and contract law — because it avoids disincentives to competition, innovation, and dissemination of new self-replicating technologies while reducing transaction costs inherent in their commercialization. Importantly, however, not all self-replicating technologies are identical, and a categorical rule exempting them from exhaustion doctrine is unwarranted. I propose instead that application of exhaustion doctrine should depend on the patentee’s ability to charge supracompetitive prices in its primary market where consumers are able to substitute secondary-market embodiments.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 4, 2012 ; Last revised: December 29, 2013

Suggested Citation

Sheff, Jeremy N., Self-Replicating Technologies (December 3, 2012). Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 229, 2013; St. John's Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-0026. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184589 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184589

Contact Information

Jeremy N. Sheff (Contact Author)
St. John's University School of Law ( email )
8000 Utopia Parkway
Jamaica, NY 11439
United States
718-990-5504 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 938
Downloads: 170
Download Rank: 104,058
Footnotes:  124

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds