References (24)


Footnotes (1)



The Ethics of Social Honeypots

David Dittrich

University of Washington

December 4, 2012

It is the nature of research that knowledge gained from one study is built upon in succeeding studies. The lessons learned – be they good or bad – help future researchers to find their path. At the same time, publication of research results is difficult when publishing imposes page limits that require leaving things out. Such restrictions in what can/can’t be included may leave unstated very important issues regarding risks to avoid, harms that were mitigated, or responsible conduct of research procedures that those who are new to a field would benefit from knowing.

This paper considers some of the ethical issues surrounding the study of malicious activity in social networks, specifically using a technique known as social honeypots combined with deception. This is a potentially touchy area of study that is common to social and behavioral research that is well understood to fall within the boundaries of human subjects research that is regulated in the United States and reviewed by Institutional Review Boards, but is not well understood by computer security researchers or those in the private sector.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 10

Keywords: social networks, honeypots, social honeypots, privacy, ethics, malware, botnets, phishing, computer security, fraud

Download This Paper

Date posted: December 5, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dittrich, David, The Ethics of Social Honeypots (December 4, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2184997 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2184997

Contact Information

David Dittrich (Contact Author)
University of Washington ( email )
1013 NE 40th St.
Seattle, WA 98105-6698
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,642
Downloads: 257
Download Rank: 72,880
References:  24
Footnotes:  1

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds