Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2185453
 


 



Fisher's Fishing Expedition


Vinay Harpalani


Savannah Law School

December 5, 2012

U. Pa. J. Const. L. Height. Scrutiny, Vol. 15, No. 57, 2013
Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2013-02

Abstract:     
This Essay delves into the Supreme Court oral arguments in Fisher v. Texas, which occurred on October 10, 2012. It examines the exchanges between the advocates and Justices, focusing on the meaning of 'critical mass' and the quest for total race neutrality in UT admissions. It argues that both of these are futile endeavors and unnecessary to decide Fisher. The entire Fisher case is a fishing expedition - albeit one that might reel in race-conscious admissions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 18

Keywords: Fisher v. Texas, Supreme Court, oral argument, race neutrality, race-conscious admissions, university admissions, affirmative action

JEL Classification: K10, K19, K39

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 5, 2012 ; Last revised: February 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Harpalani, Vinay, Fisher's Fishing Expedition (December 5, 2012). U. Pa. J. Const. L. Height. Scrutiny, Vol. 15, No. 57, 2013 ; Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2013-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2185453

Contact Information

Vinay Harpalani (Contact Author)
Savannah Law School ( email )
516 Drayton Street
Savannah, GA 31401
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,512
Downloads: 169
Download Rank: 102,574

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.625 seconds