Footnotes (138)



'Dog on Man': Are Bestiality Laws Justifiable?

Antonio M. Haynes

Cornell University - Law School

December 5, 2012

This essay examines the typical arguments deployed to support prohibitions against bestiality. Though the standard arguments are superficially appealing, upon closer inspection, the standard justifications break down, primarily because of what might be called irrational inconsistency. Part I explores the arguments related to consent. Part II explores the argument that bestiality wrongly uses animals as means. Part III examines the "public-health" arguments. Part IV assumes that some humans have a zoophilic sexual orientation, and assesses the general inclination to analogize zoophilia to pedophilia, rather than to homosexuality.

Part V offers a potentially new rationale for justifying bestiality prohibitions. This approach, borrowed from the literature regarding sexual activity among the mentally retarded, eschews a categorical ban on bestiality, and instead advocates a contextual approach grounded in assessing the level of apparent coercion. This approach would not only serve to rationalize bestiality prohibitions, but in the future might serve to bring more coherence to all laws regulating sexuality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: bestiality, zoophilia, animal rights, animal welfare, sexuality, sexual orientation, beastiality

working papers series

Download This Paper

Date posted: December 10, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Haynes, Antonio M., 'Dog on Man': Are Bestiality Laws Justifiable? (December 5, 2012). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2185469 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2185469

Contact Information

Antonio Mortez Haynes (Contact Author)
Cornell University - Law School ( email )
Myron Taylor Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,307
Downloads: 405
Download Rank: 41,856
Footnotes:  138

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds