The Bestiality Proscription: In Search of a Rationale
Antonio M. Haynes
December 5, 2012
Animal Law Review, Forthcoming
Addressing a taboo rarely discussed in scholarly works, this Article analyzes frequently advanced arguments supporting prohibitions on bestiality. Though on a superficial level the arguments seem appealing, upon closer inspection the standard justifications break down under internal inconsistencies. A differently constructed theory may not only provide a rationalized, consistent basis for regulating bestiality, but also lend greater coherence to laws regulating sexuality in general. Part II of this Article explores arguments related to consent; Part III discusses bestiality impermissibly using animals as a means; Part IV examines public health arguments, largely relating to those diseases that can spread easily from humans to animals and vice versa; Part V explores arguments analogizing zoophilia to either pedophilia or homosexuality; and Part VI offers a new rationale for justifying prohibitions on bestiality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 29
Keywords: bestiality, zoophilia, animal rights, animal welfare, sexuality, sexual orientation, beastialityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 10, 2012 ; Last revised: February 18, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds