Footnotes (138)



The Bestiality Proscription: In Search of a Rationale

Antonio M. Haynes


December 5, 2012

21 Animal L. Rev. 121 (2014)

Addressing a taboo rarely discussed in scholarly works, this Article analyzes frequently advanced arguments supporting prohibitions on bestiality. Though on a superficial level the arguments seem appealing, upon closer inspection the standard justifications break down under internal inconsistencies. A differently constructed theory may not only provide a rationalized, consistent basis for regulating bestiality, but also lend greater coherence to laws regulating sexuality in general. Part II of this Article explores arguments related to consent; Part III discusses bestiality impermissibly using animals as a means; Part IV examines public health arguments, largely relating to those diseases that can spread easily from humans to animals and vice versa; Part V explores arguments analogizing zoophilia to either pedophilia or homosexuality; and Part VI offers a new rationale for justifying prohibitions on bestiality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: bestiality, zoophilia, animal rights, animal welfare, sexuality, sexual orientation, beastiality

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 10, 2012 ; Last revised: May 12, 2015

Suggested Citation

Haynes, Antonio M., The Bestiality Proscription: In Search of a Rationale (December 5, 2012). 21 Animal L. Rev. 121 (2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2185469 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2185469

Contact Information

Antonio Mortez Haynes (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,196
Downloads: 502
Download Rank: 35,999
Footnotes:  138

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.359 seconds