Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2186305
 


 



Citizens Not United: The Lack of Stockholder Voluntariness in Corporate Political Speech


Elizabeth Pollman


Loyola Law School Los Angeles

2009

119 Yale L.J. Online 53 (2009)

Abstract:     
As the Supreme Court reconsiders prior decisions upholding limits on corporate electioneering from general funds, this Essay suggests that the longstanding concern about the lack of stockholder assent to corporate political speech is more compelling than ever. Patterns of U.S. stockholding have significantly changed in the past several decades so as to heighten the concern and caution against a broad overruling of precedents. Stockholders' ability to sell their securities or pursue a derivative action, and other means of "corporate democracy," do not alleviate the concern. A broad decision in favor of Citizens United could leave even stockholders who carefully screen and monitor their investments at risk of having money they invested used for political advocacy they oppose.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Citizens United, corporate political speech, corporate political spending, corporate speech, shareholder voluntariness, stockholder voluntariness, Bellotti

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 9, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Pollman, Elizabeth, Citizens Not United: The Lack of Stockholder Voluntariness in Corporate Political Speech (2009). 119 Yale L.J. Online 53 (2009). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2186305

Contact Information

Elizabeth Pollman (Contact Author)
Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )
919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 400
Downloads: 16

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.313 seconds