Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2186373
 
 

Footnotes (98)



 


 



Reflections on Dudley and Stephens and Killing the Innocent: Taking a Wrong Conceptual Path


Joshua Dressler


Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

2012

The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams, Dennis J. Baker and Jeremy Horder, eds., 2013, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This is a chapter of a book, Glanville Williams: The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law, to be published in 2013 by Cambridge University Press. In this chapter I argue that the famous "lifeboat" case of Dudley and Stephens was wrongly decided because Lord Coleridge failed to distinguish between the criminal law defense concepts of justification and excuse; and Professor Glanville Williams, in his critique of the case, also failed to focus on this important distinction.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: criminal law, homicide, justification, excuse, necessity, duress

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 8, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Dressler, Joshua, Reflections on Dudley and Stephens and Killing the Innocent: Taking a Wrong Conceptual Path (2012). The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams, Dennis J. Baker and Jeremy Horder, eds., 2013, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2186373

Contact Information

Joshua Dressler (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )
55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 494
Downloads: 145
Download Rank: 117,649
Footnotes:  98
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Exclusion and Control in the Carceral State
By Sharon Dolovich

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.547 seconds