Sword, Shield, and Compass: The Uses and Misuses of Racially Polarized Voting Studies in Voting Rights Enforcement

46 Pages Posted: 15 Dec 2012

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

This article addresses the multiple functions of racially polarized voting (RPV) studies, an essential element of voting rights enforcement. This type of social science analysis figures into the doctrine of voting rights in several ways, but not all of its different roles have been fully appreciated or utilized by scholars, policymakers, or the courts. In fact, several recent illustrations show that this information has been misused. By developing the three distinct functions for RPV, this article demonstrates that only its traditional function as affirmative evidence of racial discrimination has been fully advanced in the discourse. By comparison, the "shield" and "compass" uses of RPV (which, respectively, refer to a preemptive review of a jurisdiction's exposure to legal claims of vote dilution and the assessment of changes in the geographic scope and depth of racially-biased voting patterns) demand greater attention. The article concludes by offering several practical recommendations for actors to improve efforts to utilize these two other functions of RPV.

Suggested Citation

Crayton, Kareem U., Sword, Shield, and Compass: The Uses and Misuses of Racially Polarized Voting Studies in Voting Rights Enforcement (2012). Rutgers Law Review, Vol. 64, 2012, UNC Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2187319, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2187319

Kareem U. Crayton (Contact Author)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
81
Abstract Views
3,553
Rank
547,134
PlumX Metrics