Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187409
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (186)



 


 



Counterfeits, Copying and Class


Ann Bartow


Pace Law School

May 1, 2012

Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, 2012

Abstract:     
Consumers who want to express themselves by wearing contemporary clothing styles should not have to choose between expensive brands and counterfeit products. There should be a clear distinction in trademark law between illegal, counterfeit goods and perfectly legal (at least with respect to trademark law) 'knockoffs,' in which design attributes have been copied but trademarks have not. Toward that end, as a normative matter the aesthetic features of products should not be registrable or protectable as trademarks or trade dress, regardless of whether they have secondary meaning, just as functional attributes of a utilitarian nature are not eligible for Lanham Act protection. With enough advertising, any product feature can acquire distinctiveness. Only the assertive deployment of functionality bars by courts can prevent the illegitimate and costly construction of trademark-based product monopolies.

The purported trademark related harms that stem from the production and distribution of noncounterfeit knockoffs are, in reality, the effects of legitimate competition based on attributes such as price, quality, consumer appeal, and availability, with which trademark law should not interfere. Repressing or illegalizing knockoffs illegitimately prevents lower income people from procuring and enjoying goods with aesthetic attributes that are not properly monopolized through trademark law, and probably perversely increases the demand for counterfeit items.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: trademark, tradedress, likelihood of confusion, counterfeit, Lanham Act, knockoff, intellectual property, class, copying

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Bartow, Ann, Counterfeits, Copying and Class (May 1, 2012). Houston Law Review, Vol. 48, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187409

Contact Information

Ann Bartow (Contact Author)
Pace Law School ( email )
78 North Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 240
Downloads: 32
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  186
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.422 seconds