Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187437
 
 

Footnotes (108)



 


 



On the 'Considered Analysis' of Collecting DNA Before Conviction


David H. Kaye


Penn State Law

December 10, 2012

UCLA Law Review Discourse, Vol. 60, 2013, pp. 104-126
Penn State Law Research Paper No. 27-2012

Abstract:     
For nearly a decade, DNA-on-arrest laws eluded scrutiny in the courts. For another five years, they withstood a gathering storm of constitutional challenges. In Maryland v. King, however, Maryland's highest court reasoned that usually fingerprints provide everything police need to establish the true identity of an individual before trial and that the state's interest in finding the perpetrators of crimes by trawling databases of DNA profiles is too "generalized" to support "a warrantless, suspicionless search." The U.S. Supreme Court reacted forcefully. Chief Justice Roberts stayed the Maryland judgment, writing that "given the considered analysis of courts on the other side of the split, there is a fair prospect that this Court will reverse the decision below." The full Court then granted a writ of certiorari. This essay briefly examines the opinions listed by the Chief Justice and finds their analysis incomplete. I outline the Fourth Amendment questions that a fully considered analysis must answer, identify questionable dicta on the definition of "searches" and "seizures" in the opinions, describe a fundamental disagreement over the analytical framework for evaluating the reasonable warrantless searches or seizures, and criticize a creative compromise in one of the opinions that would allow sample collection without DNA testing before conviction. I conclude that the Supreme Court not only must assess the actual interests implicated by pre-conviction collection and profiling of DNA but also should articulate the appropriate framework for evaluating the reasonableness of warrantless searches in general.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: DNA databases, Fourth Amendment, search and seizure, arrest

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2012 ; Last revised: March 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Kaye, David H., On the 'Considered Analysis' of Collecting DNA Before Conviction (December 10, 2012). UCLA Law Review Discourse, Vol. 60, 2013, pp. 104-126; Penn State Law Research Paper No. 27-2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187437

Contact Information

David H. Kaye (Contact Author)
Penn State Law ( email )
Lewis Katz Building
University Park, PA 16802
United States
814 865-8974 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://law.psu.edu/faculty/resident_faculty/kaye
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 401
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 153,168
Footnotes:  108
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. A Fourth Amendment Theory for Arrestee DNA and Other Biometric Databases
By David Kaye

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds