Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187463
 
 

Footnotes (134)



 


 



Concepcion's Pro-Defendant Biasing of the Arbitration Process: The Class Counsel Solution


David Korn


Harvard Law School

David Rosenberg


Harvard Law School

December 10, 2012

Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 13-09

Abstract:     
By mandating that numerous plaintiffs litigate their common question claims separately in individual arbitrations rather than jointly in class action arbitrations, the Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion created a potent structural and systemic bias in favor of defendants. The bias arises from the parties’ divergent stakes in the outcome of the common question litigation in individual arbitrations: each plaintiff will only invest to maximize the value of his or her own claim, but the defendant has an incentive to protect its entire exposure, and thus will have a classwide incentive to invest more in contesting common questions. This investment advantage enables the defendant to wield superior litigation power against each plaintiff, skewing the outcome of individual arbitrations in its favor and frequently rendering claims not worth filing in the first place. Concepcion perpetuates the bias by precluding the use of a class arbitration solution. We propose that courts neutralize the Concepcion bias by appointing class counsel to represent each plaintiff in individual arbitrations. Without offending Concepcion’s prescriptions for maintaining the efficiency of arbitral procedures, in particular the general bar against class arbitration without express contractual authorization, the class counsel solution equalizes the parties’ investment incentives to transform individual arbitrations into a socially useful legal system for promoting the deterrence, compensation, and other public policy objectives of federal and state substantive law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Class Actions, Civil Litigation, Liability, Torts

JEL Classification: K00, K13, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 12, 2012 ; Last revised: February 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Korn, David and Rosenberg, David, Concepcion's Pro-Defendant Biasing of the Arbitration Process: The Class Counsel Solution (December 10, 2012). Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 13-09. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2187463

Contact Information

David Korn
Harvard Law School ( email )
1563 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
Michael Rosenberg (Contact Author)
Harvard Law School ( email )
1575 Massachusetts
Hauser 406
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States
617-496-4558 (Phone)
617-495-1110 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 558
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 152,449
Footnotes:  134
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Uneasy Case for Equal Access Law
By Omri Ben-shahar

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.266 seconds