Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188020
 
 

Footnotes (221)



 


 



Why the National Popular Vote Compact is Unconstitutional


Norman Williams


Willamette University - College of Law

November 19, 2012

Brigham Young University Law Review, p. 101, 2012

Abstract:     
Unable to secure passage of a federal constitutional amendment abolishing the Electoral College, several opponents of the Electoral College have sought to establish the direct, popular election of the President via an interstate compact according to which individual signatory states agree to appoint their presidential electors in accordance with the nationwide popular vote. Ostensibly designed to prevent elections, such as the one in 2000, in which the Electoral College “misfired” and chose the candidate who received fewer popular votes, the National Popular Vote Compact has been adopted by several states, including California. In this Article, I argue that the National Popular Vote Compact violates the Presidential Elections Clause of Article II of the U.S. Constitution. Although the text of the Clause seem to give states unlimited power to select the manner in which each state’s presidential electors are chosen, a close reading of U.S. history suggests the need and propriety of limiting the scope of state authority under the Clause. Not only did the Framers of the Constitution expressly reject the idea of a direct, popular election for President, but not one state either in the wake of ratification or at any time thereafter has ever sought to appoint its presidential electors on the basis of votes cast outside the state, as the NPVC requires. In the same way that similar historical considerations led the U.S. Supreme Court to limit the scope of state authority with respect to federal legislative elections, this history regarding the Presidential Elections Clause likewise counsels in favor of a more limited understanding of state authority under Article II. As such, if opponents wish to abolish the Electoral College, the sole constitutionally proper mechanism for doing so is a federal constitutional amendment, not an interstate compact negotiated by a handful of states.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 61

Keywords: national popular vote, presidential election, constitution

JEL Classification: K1, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 11, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Williams, Norman, Why the National Popular Vote Compact is Unconstitutional (November 19, 2012). Brigham Young University Law Review, p. 101, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188020

Contact Information

Norman Williams (Contact Author)
Willamette University - College of Law ( email )
245 Winter St. SE
Salem, OR 97301
United States
503-370-6190 (Phone)
503-370-6375 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 524
Downloads: 69
Download Rank: 195,692
Footnotes:  221

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds