Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188129
 
 

Footnotes (172)



 


 



Remedying Pretrial Ineffective Assistance


Justin F. Marceau


University of Denver Sturm College of Law

December 11, 2012

45 Texas Tech Law Review 1 (2012)
U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-02

Abstract:     
This Article explores a particular example of the right-remedy gap identified by leading federal courts scholars, the problem of remedying pretrial ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, the question is what form of federal constitutional remediation is available (and ought to be available) when defense counsel provides incompetent representation resulting in the discovery of inculpatory evidence against the defendant. Although instances of pretrial errors of counsel resulting in the discovery of materially incriminating evidence are numerically rare in the published case law, when they arise defense lawyers and judges are without any guidance for how to proceed. In addition, these cases provide a useful lens for understanding, more generally, the scope and nature of Sixth Amendment remedies in federal court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 38

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 11, 2013 ; Last revised: January 24, 2013

Suggested Citation

Marceau, Justin F., Remedying Pretrial Ineffective Assistance (December 11, 2012). 45 Texas Tech Law Review 1 (2012); U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188129

Contact Information

Justin F. Marceau (Contact Author)
University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )
2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 179
Downloads: 39
Footnotes:  172

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.500 seconds