Too Many Clients, Too Little Time: How States are Forcing Public Defenders to Violate Their Ethical Obligations
Nova Southeastern University - Shepard Broad Law Center
December 12, 2012
Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 91, 2012
NSU Shepard Broad Law Center Research Paper No. 12-007
Budget cuts have had a devastating effect on public defenders and their ability to effectively represent indigent clients, mostly in the form of increasing caseloads. Much has been written about the effect these excessive caseloads have had on indigent defendants’ right to counsel. This article, instead, focuses on how excessive caseloads are placing public defenders in ethical dilemmas. Public defenders are bound by the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, but these high caseloads are making it increasingly difficult for them to meet these required ethical standards. Specifically, it is more challenging for an attorney to represent indigent clients diligently and competently when dealing with caseload numbers well beyond the recommended levels. The author discusses why the solutions being offered by the American Bar Association‘s Formal Opinion 06-441 are not tenable and concludes that true reform in indigent defense is the only way to alleviate the excessive caseloads.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: public defender, indigent clients, right to counsel, Model Rules of Professional Conduct, caseloads, ethical standards, American Bar Association, American Bar Association's Formal Opinion 06-441, reform, indigent defense
JEL Classification: K10, K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 12, 2012
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.440 seconds