Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188596
 
 

Footnotes (177)



 


 



Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-Making and the Problem of False Confessions


Steven Penney


University of Alberta - Faculty of Law

December 12, 2012

(2012) 57 Supreme Court Law Review (2d) 263
Unsettled Legacy: Thirty Years of Criminal Justice under the Charter, p. 297, Benjamin L. Berger and James Stribopoulos, eds., LexisNexis, 2012

Abstract:     
Unlike in the areas of detention and search, Parliament has played no role in regulating the questioning of adult criminal suspects by police. This paper examines the implications of this legislative silence. Critics of the courts’ use of the ancillary powers doctrine in the law of detention and search have argued that the optimal regulation of police investigative practices requires robust legislative input. I argue that the same is true of police questioning. But given the improbability that this will happen, I argue that appellate courts should adopt a more robustly “regulatory” (as opposed to “adjudicative”) approach to both the common law confessions rule and section 10(b) of the Charter. I then explore how such an approach could better address the chief policy issue raised by police questioning: false confessions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 30

Keywords: False confessions, criminal procedure, charter of rights, police questioning, Reid technique, right to counsel, 10(b), confessions rule, voluntary confessions rule

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Penney, Steven, Police Questioning in the Charter Era: Adjudicative versus Regulatory Rule-Making and the Problem of False Confessions (December 12, 2012). Unsettled Legacy: Thirty Years of Criminal Justice under the Charter, p. 297, Benjamin L. Berger and James Stribopoulos, eds., LexisNexis, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188596

Contact Information

Steven Penney (Contact Author)
University of Alberta - Faculty of Law ( email )
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5
Canada
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 165
Downloads: 46
Footnotes:  177

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.312 seconds