Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188719
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



Debating Law's Irrelevance: Legal Scholarship and the Coase Theorem in the 1960s


Steven G. Medema


University of Colorado Denver - Department of Economics

August 6, 2014

Texas A&M Law Review 2 (December 2014).

Abstract:     
This paper examines the diffusion of Coase’s negotiation result -- now better known as the 'Coase theorem' -- in the legal literature during the 1960s, with particular attention paid to the challenge that this result posed for received legal thinking, how the it related to far older attempts to bring economic thinking to bear on the law, how legal scholars utilized it in their analysis, and how the treatment of this result by legal scholars compares to that accorded it by economists during this formative stage in the Coase theorem’s history. What will emerge, in the end, is an enhanced understanding of how the Coase theorem came to have a place in legal scholarship, as well as some additional insight into this neglected epoch in the history of the economic analysis of law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 70

Keywords: Coase theorem, law and economics

JEL Classification: K00, B2

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 13, 2012 ; Last revised: August 13, 2014

Suggested Citation

Medema , Steven G., Debating Law's Irrelevance: Legal Scholarship and the Coase Theorem in the 1960s (August 6, 2014). Texas A&M Law Review 2 (December 2014).. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2188719 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2188719

Contact Information

Steven G. Medema (Contact Author)
University of Colorado Denver - Department of Economics ( email )
Box 173364
Denver, CO 80217-3364
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 316
Downloads: 93
Download Rank: 165,660
Footnotes:  80

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds