Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2190570
 
 

Footnotes (80)



 


 



Criminal Defense Lawyer Moneyball: A Demonstration Project


Ronald F. Wright


Wake Forest University - School of Law

Ralph A. Peeples


Wake Forest University - School of Law

December 17, 2012

Washington and Lee Law Review, Forthcoming
Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 2190570

Abstract:     
The book and movie “Moneyball” portray the iconoclastic general manager of a baseball team. When drafting new players, this GM de-emphasized the insights of baseball scouts as on-the-scene evaluators of a player’s talents, and looked instead to statistical measures of player quality. We take this idea from baseball into the criminal courts. In this article, we argue that criminal defense organizations could meaningfully evaluate the skills of their attorneys through the use of metrics, rather than relying so heavily on the in-person observation of their work in the courtroom. Statistical performance-based rankings could support better leadership in defense attorney organizations.

Rather than simply assert that a rating system is possible, we attempt in this paper to show its feasibility. We employ data from the North Carolina courts as a demonstration project to illustrate how an office might develop a rating system for the attorneys who work there. Our attorney ratings are based on the bottom line: sentencing reductions those attorneys achieve for their clients, principally through plea negotiations. We then use our tentative quality ratings to address the question of structural causes. What makes one attorney noticeably more or less effective than the typical defense lawyer? Our most surprising discovery is that experience actually has a negative correlation with performance after the first eight years: the more time an attorney has spent in the profession, the more likely that her clients will obtain a more severe sentence. We close with some reflections on other potential users of a statistical rating system, concluding that managers of defense organizations are better situated than judges, prosecutors, or clients to make wise use of ratings data.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: Criminal Procedure, Criminal Defense, Criminal Adjudication, Professional Development, Negotiation

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 18, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Wright, Ronald F. and Peeples, Ralph A., Criminal Defense Lawyer Moneyball: A Demonstration Project (December 17, 2012). Washington and Lee Law Review, Forthcoming; Wake Forest Univ. Legal Studies Paper No. 2190570. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2190570

Contact Information

Ronald F. Wright (Contact Author)
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
336-758-5727 (Phone)
336-758-4496 (Fax)

Ralph A. Peeples
Wake Forest University - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
336-758-5710 (Phone)
336-758-4496 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 841
Downloads: 127
Download Rank: 135,513
Footnotes:  80
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. Vindicating the Right to Counsel
By Cecelia Klingele

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds