Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192093
 
 

References (43)



 
 

Footnotes (29)



 


 



Transparent and Opaque Consent in Contract Formation


Lawrence M. Solan


Brooklyn Law School

December 20, 2012

Susan Ehrlich, Diana Eades and Janet Ainsworth (eds.), Coercion and Consent in the Legal Process: Linguistic and Discursive Perspectives (Oxford University Press), Forthcoming
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 318

Abstract:     
If I say that I “consent to your terms,” I can mean that I consent to terms a-n, which you have proposed. But I also can mean that I consent to your terms, whatever they are, even if I don’t know what they are. Philosophers of language sometimes call the first reading “transparent” and the second reading “opaque.” The phenomenon occurs with many verbs. A classic illustration in the literature is “Bond believes that the author of this letter is a spy.” The speaker may be thinking of a particular author (the transparent reading), or may be saying that Bond has a good ear for spy talk, even though he could not identify the author (the opaque reading).

This essay argues that as commercial life has become more commodified, opaque consent has become more the norm, with the result that consent is often given in total ignorance of what has been proposed. Yet I disagree with those who argue that one does not consent if one does not know or understand the terms that have been proposed. Instead I argue that the fact that such verbs are ambiguous in the way described above licenses judges to apply standard contract doctrines, often developed more than a century ago with the assumption of transparent consent, to situations involving opaque consent.

I conclude with suggestions for how judges can become more flexible by requiring some combination of transparency and opacity without forsaking the notion that consent is at the heart of contract formation. The EU has had a directive to that effect in place for about two decades. And if judges cannot begin to do so, legislatures should step in.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: contract, consent, consumer, opacity, transparency

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Solan, Lawrence M., Transparent and Opaque Consent in Contract Formation (December 20, 2012). Susan Ehrlich, Diana Eades and Janet Ainsworth (eds.), Coercion and Consent in the Legal Process: Linguistic and Discursive Perspectives (Oxford University Press), Forthcoming; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 318. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192093

Contact Information

Lawrence M. Solan (Contact Author)
Brooklyn Law School ( email )
250 Joralemon Street
Brooklyn, NY 11201
United States
718-780-0357 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://www.brooklaw.edu/lawrence_solan

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 361
Downloads: 84
Download Rank: 178,937
References:  43
Footnotes:  29

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds