Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (79)



 


 



Community Economic Development and the Paradox of Power


Michael Diamond


Georgetown University Law Center

2012

Irish Review of Community Economic Development Law and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-21, 2012
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-192
Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-043

Abstract:     
This article starts from the premise that poverty is a growing problem in the United States. Intergenerational poverty, the entrenchment of a class of very poor people, is a major sub set of that problem and is tied very closely to the issue of race. The author claims that missing in the fight by the poor and their allies against stratified poverty is the creation and utilization of power. This paper examines the disparate ways in which commentators have defined power. It suggests that those seeking to obtain power must understand the concept’s varying meanings and direct their activities to meet their own understanding of the concept. Community Economic Development (CED) may be nothing more than a re-affirmation of existing power relationships or it may be the cause and the result of a change in those relationships. This paper attempts to make sense of this apparent paradox.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: CED, theories of power, poverty, race

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K19

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 21, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Diamond, Michael R., Community Economic Development and the Paradox of Power (2012). Irish Review of Community Economic Development Law and Policy, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-21, 2012; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 12-192; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-043. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192137

Contact Information

Michael R. Diamond (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 120
Downloads: 37
Footnotes:  79

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.344 seconds