Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192471
 


 



Open Book: The Failed Promise of Information Privacy in America


James P. Nehf


Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law

January 21, 2013


Abstract:     
With financial and other personal information about us in countless databases, and with companies such as Facebook and Google collecting data about their users to drive profits and satisfy expectations of shareholders, there is a pervasive concern that we have little control over access to potentially harmful uses of that information. Moreover, many consumers believe that little can be done to address the problem except to give out as little information as possible and try our best to monitor our credit reports and financial accounts in an effort to detect unexpected activity if it occurs. By not enacting strong information privacy laws in the non-governmental sector, the U.S. Congress and the fifty states have effectively defaulted to a market-based model of privacy protection that relies heavily on individual self-policing and market incentives as the primary means of information control. A self-policing privacy protection model could be effective if a market for information privacy were possible — if well informed individuals could shop their privacy preferences effectively. This book-length paper (the book itself will be available in 2013) examines the reasons why this is highly unlikely and why privacy laws in the United States (or the lack thereof) will not protect legitimate consumer interests in the years to come. Part 1 shows why information privacy is a social or societal value and not just an individual concern. Part 2 examines in more detail why individualist, market approaches to privacy protection are destined to fail. Part 3 continues this theme and examines research in behavioral sciences about how consumers make decisions in market transactions. Part 4 concludes by critiquing the “new” privacy framework released by the Federal Trade Commission. While the framework contains hopeful rhetoric calling for greater emphasis on societal solutions to privacy concerns, most of the framework continues to rely heavily on individual notice and choice in transactions that involve exchanges of personal information.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 274

Keywords: privacy, information privacy, FTC, new privacy framework, do not track, cost benefit, CBA, societal value, incomparability, social value

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 22, 2012 ; Last revised: April 20, 2013

Suggested Citation

Nehf, James P., Open Book: The Failed Promise of Information Privacy in America (January 21, 2013). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192471 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2192471

Contact Information

James P. Nehf (Contact Author)
Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law ( email )
530 West New York Street
Indianapolis, IN 46202
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 881
Downloads: 124
Download Rank: 135,109

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.328 seconds