Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192623
 
 

Footnotes (22)



 


 



Comparative Institutional Analysis and a New Legal Realism


Gregory Shaffer


University of California, Irvine School of Law

December 21, 2012

Wisconsin Law Review, No.2, 2013, pp.607-628
Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-67

Abstract:     
This article, for a symposium of the Wisconsin Law Review on Professor Neil Komesar’s work on comparative institutional analysis assesses his framework from a new legal realist perspective. Komesar powerfully shows how the pursuit of any substantive goal is mediated through different institutional processes that will affect outcomes, so that institutional analysis is required. Moreover, since all institutional processes are imperfect, whether the imperfections are in the market, the political process, or the courts, such institutional analysis must be comparative. This article’s core claim is that comparative institutional analysis is empty without a new legal realist assessment of how real-life institutions operate in particular contexts, and that new legal realism is of no practical use without an analytic framework in which to translate and organize its findings for purposes of real-life decision making. Comparative institutional analysis and new legal realism are thus complementary components of any policy-relevant analysis of law.

Part I presents Komesar’s comparative institutional analytic framework. Part II compares it with other forms of comparative institutional analysis used in the social sciences. Part III examines the challenge of applying comparative institutional analysis, which can be critiqued (by some) for being too narrow in its neoclassical law-and-economics focus on incentives, and (by others) for being too unwieldy on account of the variables at play. Part IV discusses why a new legal realism grounded in both empirics and a subtle understanding of law’s normativity in different institutional settings needs to complement comparative institutional analysis. Part V presents a brief example of the application of new legal realist empirics and comparative institutional analysis in the international context.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 23

Keywords: comparative institutional analysis, legal realism, global governance

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 22, 2012 ; Last revised: August 27, 2014

Suggested Citation

Shaffer, Gregory, Comparative Institutional Analysis and a New Legal Realism (December 21, 2012). Wisconsin Law Review, No.2, 2013, pp.607-628; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-67. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2192623

Contact Information

Gregory C. Shaffer (Contact Author)
University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )
401 E. Peltason
Irvine, CA 92612
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 701
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 95,514
Footnotes:  22

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.282 seconds