Law School Marketing and Legal Ethics
University of Missouri School of Law
91 Nebraska Law Review 866 (2013)
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-41
Law schools have misled prospective students for years about the value of legal education. In some cases, law school officials have engaged in outright deceit, knowingly spreading false information about their schools. More commonly, they have presented statistics — especially those concerning the employment outcomes of law graduates — in ways nearly guaranteed to confuse readers. These deceptions and sharp practices violate the norms of the legal profession, a profession that scrupulously regulates the advertising of legal services. The deceptions also violate ethical rules prohibiting lawyers from engaging in dishonesty, misrepresentation, and deceit.
This article exposes how pitches aimed at prospective students, including the seemingly straightforward recitation of statistics on law school websites, still paint an unduly rosy picture of the legal employment market. Focusing on Rule 8.4(c) of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, the article explains that law school officials have exposed themselves to professional discipline, which may offer a solution to the pervasive problem of misleading law school marketing.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 60
Keywords: Law school marketing, NALP, AALS, ABA, U.S. News, advertising, Rule 8.4(c), Rule 8.3, Association of American Law Schools, American Bar Association, National Association for Law Placement, accreditation, salaries, scholarships, IBR, income-based repayment, employment, employment statisticsAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 21, 2012 ; Last revised: June 25, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.484 seconds