Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2193556
 


 



'Always Speaking?': Interpreting the Present Tense in Statutes


Neal Goldfarb


Butzel Long Tighe Patton PLLC

December 24, 2012

Canadian Journal of Linguistics, Forthcoming

Abstract:     
This article takes a critical look through the lens of linguistics at the “always-speaking” principle in law — an influential principle that is recited in materials on legislative drafting as the justification for using the present tense, adopted in many common-law jurisdictions as a principle of interpretation, and accepted as a foundation for the linguistic analysis of the use of tense in statutes. The article concludes that the principle is an inadequate basis for interpreting or analysing statutes, for at least two reasons: (i) the interpretive results that the principle is intended to support are explainable in terms of widely accepted principles in the analysis of tense, without any need to posit special principles that apply only to statutes; and (ii) the interpretations that would be required if the always-speaking principle were taken seriously would in many cases probably be regarded as unnatural by native speakers of English.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 3, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Goldfarb, Neal, 'Always Speaking?': Interpreting the Present Tense in Statutes (December 24, 2012). Canadian Journal of Linguistics, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2193556

Contact Information

Neal Goldfarb (Contact Author)
Butzel Long Tighe Patton PLLC ( email )
United States
HOME PAGE: LAWnLinguistics.com
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 722
Downloads: 150
Download Rank: 114,920

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.673 seconds