Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2193987
 
 

Footnotes (155)



 


 



The Most Fascinating Kind of Art: Fashion Design Protection as a Moral Right


Katelyn N. Andrews


New York University School of Law

November 1, 2012

New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, Vol. 2, p. 188, 2012

Abstract:     
In recent years, politicians, academics, and industry professionals have argued vehemently that copyright protection should extend to cover fashion designs, which are currently excluded under the “useful articles” doctrine. These arguments have proved somewhat successful, as a number of bills have been drafted to expand copyright laws to include fashion, most recently the Innovative Design Protection Act of 2012, and two congressional hearings have been held on the subject. None of bills, however, have managed to gain much traction in Congress, and progress appears to be stalled. My objective in this Note is not to examine the legislation that has been proposed, but to uncover why the supporters of fashion copyright have been so steadfast in their promotion of it. Copyright in the United States is built on economic principles and aims to incentivize innovation. It seems clear that from an economic perspective, copyright is unneeded to incentivize creativity in the fashion industry. After reviewing the legislative history and other arguments made by proponents of fashion copyright, a different picture emerges: supporters of fashion copyright view fashion as “art” and feel a sense of harm when it is cheaply or slavishly copied. Even if designers feel no economic harm from the copying of their creations, they are morally harmed by it. Perhaps then moral rights law, not copyright, provides the appropriate theoretical framework in which to analyze the extension of further protections to fashion design. The stalled debate over fashion copyright might be revitalized by discussing design protection in the more theoretically relevant framework of moral rights laws, which are concerned with reputational — as opposed to economic — harms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: fashion, fashion copyright, design copyright, moral rights, IDPPPA, innovative design piracy protection and prohibition act, IDPA, innovative design protection act, design protection, fashion as art

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 26, 2012  

Suggested Citation

Andrews, Katelyn N., The Most Fascinating Kind of Art: Fashion Design Protection as a Moral Right (November 1, 2012). New York University Journal of Intellectual Property & Entertainment Law, Vol. 2, p. 188, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2193987

Contact Information

Katelyn N. Andrews (Contact Author)
New York University School of Law ( email )
40 Washington Square South
New York, NY 10012-1099
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 469
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 192,582
Footnotes:  155

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds