Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2195989
 
 

Footnotes (288)



 


 



The Google Shortcut to Trademark Law


Lisa Larrimore Ouellette


Stanford University

February 8, 2013

California Law Review, Vol. 102, p. 351, 2014

Abstract:     
Trademark distinctiveness — the extent to which consumers view a mark as identifying a particular source — is the key factual issue in assessing whether a mark is protectable and what the scope of that protection should be. But distinctiveness is difficult to evaluate in practice: assessments of “inherent distinctiveness” are highly subjective, survey evidence is expensive and unreliable, and other measures of “acquired distinctiveness” such as advertising spending are poor proxies for consumer perceptions. But there is now a simpler way to determine whether consumers associate a word or phrase with a certain product: Google. Through a study of trademark cases and contemporaneous search results, I argue that Google can generally capture both prongs of the test for trademark distinctiveness: if a mark is strong — either inherently distinctive or commercially strong — then many top search results for that mark relate to the source it identifies. The extent of results overlap between searches for two different marks can also be relevant for assessing the likelihood of confusion of those marks. In the cases where Google and the court disagree, I argue that Google more accurately reflects how consumers view a given mark. Courts have generally given online search results little weight in offline trademark disputes. But the key factual questions in these cases depend on the wisdom of the crowds, making Google’s “algorithmic authority” highly probative.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 58

Keywords: trademark, algorithms, search engines, distinctiveness, secondary meaning, confusion

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 3, 2013 ; Last revised: March 22, 2014

Suggested Citation

Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore, The Google Shortcut to Trademark Law (February 8, 2013). California Law Review, Vol. 102, p. 351, 2014. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2195989 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195989

Contact Information

Lisa Larrimore Ouellette (Contact Author)
Stanford University ( email )
Stanford, CA 94305
United States
HOME PAGE: http://law.stanford.edu/profile/lisa-larrimore-ouellette
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,028
Downloads: 860
Download Rank: 14,711
Footnotes:  288
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.297 seconds