No, Small Probabilities are Not 'Attractive to Sell': A Comment
Nassim Nicholas Taleb
Independent Researcher; NYU-Poly Institute; New England Complex Systems Institute
January 5, 2013
Financial Analysts Journal, Forthcoming
Owing to the convexity of the payoff of out-of-the money options, an extremely small probability of a large deviation unseen in past data justifies rationally buying them, or at least justifies excessive caution in not being exposed to them, particularly those options that are extremely nonlinear in response to market movement or changes in implied volatility. One needs, for instance, a minimum of 2000 years of stock market data to assert that some tail options are "expensive." The paper presents errors in Ilmanen (2012), which provides an exhaustive list of all arguments in favor of selling insurance on small probability events. The paper goes beyond Ilmanen (2012) and suggests an approach to analyze the payoff and risks of options based on the nonlinearities in the tails.
Date posted: January 6, 2013 ; Last revised: February 2, 2015
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.515 seconds