Footnotes (104)



Liability for Encouraging One's Own Murder, Victims, and Other Exempt Parties

Dennis J Baker

University of Surrey - School of Law


(2012) 23(3) King’s Law Journal 257–285

This paper considers three major issues in the law of complicity: (1) the role of oblique intention in complicity; (2) complicity liability for those who engage in mutual gun- fights in public streets; and (3) the scope of the ‘exempt party’ rule. All of these issues arose in R v Gnango, but unfortunately the UK Supreme Court’s treatment of those issues was wholly unsatisfactory. Nonetheless, that decision provides us with a perfect backdrop for exploring these issues. I aim to demonstrate that the Lords got the law wrong. I will put forward an alternative interpretation of the law. I rely extensively on American law, but I am not aiming to carry out a full comparative study. Instead, the aim is to shed light on how the law might be reformed, interpreted and developed in the UK. The American case law is useful for highlighting some of the legal misconceptions drawn by the Lords in R v Gnango.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Baker, Dennis J, Liability for Encouraging One's Own Murder, Victims, and Other Exempt Parties (2012). (2012) 23(3) King’s Law Journal 257–285. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2198408

Contact Information

Dennis J. Baker (Contact Author)
University of Surrey - School of Law ( email )
Guildford, England GU2 7XH
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 686
Downloads: 228
Download Rank: 90,351
Footnotes:  104

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.375 seconds