Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=2198408
 
 

Footnotes (104)



 


 



Liability for Encouraging One's Own Murder, Victims, and Other Exempt Parties


Dennis J. Baker


King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law

2012

(2012) 23(3) King’s Law Journal 257–285

Abstract:     
This paper considers three major issues in the law of complicity: (1) the role of oblique intention in complicity; (2) complicity liability for those who engage in mutual gun- fights in public streets; and (3) the scope of the ‘exempt party’ rule. All of these issues arose in R v Gnango, but unfortunately the UK Supreme Court’s treatment of those issues was wholly unsatisfactory. Nonetheless, that decision provides us with a perfect backdrop for exploring these issues. I aim to demonstrate that the Lords got the law wrong. I will put forward an alternative interpretation of the law. I rely extensively on American law, but I am not aiming to carry out a full comparative study. Instead, the aim is to shed light on how the law might be reformed, interpreted and developed in the UK. The American case law is useful for highlighting some of the legal misconceptions drawn by the Lords in R v Gnango.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 9, 2013  

Suggested Citation

Baker, Dennis J., Liability for Encouraging One's Own Murder, Victims, and Other Exempt Parties (2012). (2012) 23(3) King’s Law Journal 257–285. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2198408

Contact Information

Dennis J. Baker (Contact Author)
King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law ( email )
Somerset House East Wing
Strand
London, WC2R 2LS
United Kingdom

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 580
Downloads: 188
Download Rank: 95,833
Footnotes:  104

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds